By CHARLES CHIJIOKE
A Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has been shown video evidence in the ongoing trial of six individuals accused of plotting to overthrow the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, with two of the defendants admitting they were aware of the alleged plan.
The court, presided over by Joyce Abdulmalik, viewed recorded interrogation sessions presented by prosecutors. In the footage, retired Navy Captain Erasmus Victor and Police Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim acknowledged knowledge of the purported coup discussions, while retired
Major-General Mohammed Gana denied any involvement or awareness.
Inspector Ibrahim, who was attached to the State House, told investigators that what began as efforts to assist a contact with promotion matters later evolved into conversations about overthrowing the government. He admitted receiving between N1.4 million and N1.5 million and conducting reconnaissance around the Presidential Villa, including photographing sensitive areas and identifying access routes.
According to his statement, coded language such as “fertiliser” and “farming” was allegedly used to disguise discussions about funding and operational planning. Despite this, Ibrahim insisted his actions were influenced by “misplaced judgment,” adding that he never believed the plot could succeed, saying he only “played along” because he considered it unrealistic for the group to penetrate the State House.
Defence lawyers challenged the admissibility of the video recordings, arguing that the statements were not made voluntarily and should not be played in open court before being formally admitted as evidence. However, Justice Abdulmalik overruled the objections, stating it was standard procedure, while noting that a trial-within-trial would determine whether the confessions were obtained under duress.
Investigators maintained that all interview sessions were conducted in line with the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, stressing that suspects were informed of their rights, including the option to remain silent, and that recordings were made to ensure transparency and guard against coercion.
The case underscores rising concerns over internal security and the integrity of state institutions, particularly given the alleged involvement of serving and retired security personnel. If proven, the charges could carry severe legal consequences, including lengthy prison terms, while also prompting tighter surveillance and vetting within critical government facilities.
Further proceedings are expected to continue as the court examines the admissibility of the evidence and the credibility of the defendants’ statements.
